Data covering the period 2011 to first quarter of 2017, most of which were for 2016, were taken from the source agencies as well as agency websites and publications. The data were compared with the PDP
strategies/targets to determine the status or probability of achieving these targets, thus, providing indications on the performance of the sectors during the plan period.
The strategies/targets indicated in the PDP are mostly for 2016 which is the end of the plan period. However, there are some strategies with annual targets, while others do not have targets.
For indicators with
end-of-plan targets, the 2016 actual data, if available, were compared with the corresponding target.
For the other indicators, the tracking method used for monitoring the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) was adopted, as follows:
If the pace of performance is:
|more than 0.9||---- good performance|
|between 0.5 and 0.9||---- average performance|
|less than 0.5||---- poor performance|
For indicators with zero baseline, the ratio of the actual accomplishment with the annual target is considered in the computation of pace of performance.
For indicators without targets, the pace of performance is described as either increasing or decreasing depending on the trend of the available data for the given years.
The following icons are used:
|For indicators with end-of-plan targets and with 2016 actual data:|
|Hit||The target was attained|
|Missed||The target was not attained|
|For indicators with end-of-plan targets but without 2016 actual data:|
|Good performance||The probability of attaining the target is high and thus, the target is likely to be attained|
|Average performance||The probability of attaining the target is medium and thus, the target may or may not be attained|
|Poor performance||The probability of attaining the target is low and thus, the target is not likely to be attained
|For indicators with no specified target:|